<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Notes From Off Center - Latest Comments in Can a Newborn Punish You?</title><link>http://notesfromoffcenter.disqus.com/</link><description>society and theology from the view of a Christian pragmatist.</description><atom:link href="https://notesfromoffcenter.disqus.com/can_a_newborn_punish_you/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:18:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Can a Newborn Punish You?</title><link>http://notes-from-offcenter.com/2008/03/31/can-a-newborn-punish-you/#comment-1539749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are right, Drew. This sort of critisism is not reasonable. Unfortunitly, political rehetoric is not a discourse of reason, and using this phrase was probably a mistake. Nonetheless, I read two different Washington Post articles that could have highlighted it, and neither did. Robert Novak's op ed simply states that Barack quickly explained why "I am pro-choice".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It looks like his remark is drawing only fire from conservatives. Big deal. We already know where they stand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And, right or wrong, he won't use this phrase again. In a week no one will remember it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:18:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>